Idea behind (skid_concept)

By definition...

Main Entry: 1skid
Pronunciation: \skid\
Function: noun, verb
Etymology: perhaps of Scandinavian origin; akin to Old Norse skīth "stick of wood"
Date: circa 1610

1: one of a group of objects (as planks or logs) used to support or elevate a structure or object
2: to apply a brake or skid to : slow or halt by a skid

I could take a couple of different perspectives on this idea. One being, my ideas are used to support and progess something towards bettering itself. Two, I apply a break to myself. Acting without or before thinking only brings unecessary complexity and consequences. Or it could just be a simple play on my name...
sheldon kazmarski design concept

Insight.

I'm a moderately expressed extrovert, who thinks outloud. I like to expand upon my emotions. I'm fatigued by a lack of stimulation. I live life to understand it. I am an idealist. A conceptualist. I match my artistic style to French Art Nuveau. I share an afinity for flat dynamic silhouettes, with subtle accents. I have a love for drawing. I never start a project without fully sketching out my ideas.

I visualize the completed elements as awhole through use of my imagination. Before whn I studied architecture I didall of my drawings by hand. It is said that there are some thigns a computer cando better than the hand. I believe it is the other way around. Hand drawings are beautiful and bring line to life. A new element is added to the picture, human vulnerability in making mistakes.



Monday, February 18, 2008

Text Reading- Scott Greiger

The first passage about Scott Grieger intrigued me. Mainly becuase it taps on a side of my creative inspiration. "Grieger is an artist whoe muse neither soars on imaginative fancy nor burrows into the dark recesses of the soul. Instead, it resides in commonplace experiences andnormal modes of perception. Grieger's mind is stocked with images that are typically ignored during the searches for artistic insight. They are encountered as logos and illustrations." I too gather my inspirations from some logos and illustrations. I have a background in graphic design as well and bad logo excite me. They bother me. They make me want to laugh and cry. To often, nowadays, people buy a program learn how to use it and call themselves a graphic designer. And they never learn actually how to design or create. They learn how to make. But alot of the times their logos or concepts are horrible and sends complete opposite meanings to the viewer. So I wonder what attracts him to logos? What attracts him to illustrations? Why doesn't he tap into thedark recesses of his soul? Is it because he is trying to keep his involvement in the piece to a minimum from the viewers stand point. Like with the Nike symbol. Someone else created the Nike symbol. But Grieger re-created it. So who is the artist. Most people would still think the person who origianlly designed the Nike logo would be the artist. I find it hard to believe that Grieger doesn't tap into his imaginative fantasies. Afterall, a fantasy can be a mere day dream, and a day dream, can be a mere thought, and a thought can be a simple idea. And he obviously had an idea for what else this Nike symbol could be. A "swooshtika". His statement about logos and icons are true..."are potential attitude-benders and opinion modifiers. They consittute a collective language capable of addressing such issues as classdistinctions, ecological respoinsibility, gender identities, and social values. These messages are absorbed without instruction. They infiltrate our minds and often become indiistinguishablefrom thoughts that are self-induced." Just like I love bad logo design. My fasciantion with bad logos is that they haunt me. They speak a different language than well designed ones.

No comments: